Biochar Makes Organic Farming Practical
Almost every farmer is aware of organic techniques for fertilizing crops, yet the majority still use chemical fertilizers — why is that? Dig a little deeper (excusing the pun) and you will find that it is not uncommon for a family farm to have an organic garden for their own vegetables, but still use chemical fertilizers on their commercial crops. They know organic is better, so why use chemicals?
The answer lies in simple economics. Preparing compost is labor intensive, and labor is expensive. Also, specialized farmers rarely produce the right mix of high-carbon and high-nitrogen materials to produce compost in sufficient quantities to keep large acreage productive. Then there are the issues with pest control, which is easier with chemicals. That is one area I can’t claim biochar will help much — but for the soil fertilization it solves several problems at once.
The rising cost of petroleum-derived fertilizers has some traditional farmers taking a second look at organic methods already — add biochar to the mix and the equation turns around completely.
Adding biochar at the composting stage of organic field treatment adds little to the labor costs, just the effort required to produce the biochar itself. The effect, however, is substantial. Not only does biochar make the compost more effective — it makes those effects last much longer. Testing is still underway to determine how long the benefits last, and only time will tell (duh!) — but it appears that biochar enriched organic soil will remain productive for years, without the need for frequent application of additional compost. So those high labor costs can now be amortized over several (or many?) years. And small quantities of compost can be used each year to gradually reclaim a large area from the blight of chemical addiction.
So now the farmer has lower fertilizer costs and higher production. If the area requires irrigation, there may also be savings on water costs, because biochar enriched soil retains water better. Not to mention that the runoff is less polluted, and so our environment also benefits.
And each time the price of crude oil rises, these benefits only become more compelling.
I’ve seen several news reports that treat biochar as something that would be of benefit to third-world farmers who can not afford fertilizer. That kind of misconception needs to be wiped away with clear-headed analysis of the true costs and benefits — long term. And oh yes, it might help slow or even stop global warming, if adopted on a large scale.
